Islamic terrorists worse than the Nazis

Posted on December 21, 2010

Posted: December 21, 2010
By Chuck Morse
It has been almost 10 years since the 9/11 attack on America by Islamic terrorists, and we are still cowering in fear as we get on passenger planes. Ten years later and our airports are becoming the equivalent of military checkpoints as we undergo the equivalent of humiliating strip searches and pat downs. Yet we are still not safe from the senseless murderers. As usual, the terror alert has been heightened for the holidays.

At least the Nazis and the Communists collectively targeted specific groups as opposed to the Islamic terrorists, who target everyone in the world who refused to submit to their will. Modern terrorism was started by Soviet dictator V. I. Lenin who, drawing inspiration from his mentor Karl Marx, launched a policy of collective guilt. In January 1918, Lenin ordered his secret police, the Cheka, the task of shooting on the spot one out of every 10 found guilty of idling. He publicly called on the Cheka: Until we apply the terror … shooting on the spot … to speculators, we shall achieve nothing. He called for the arrest and the shooting of takers of bribes, swindlers, etc. On Feb. 22, 1918, he authorized the Cheka to seek out, arrest, and shoot immediately a series of categories of enemies. Lenin was responsible for an estimated 4 million murders in the early years of Soviet control over Russia, and many liberals back then responded with applause.

An example of this enabling attitude was expressed by liberal American journalist Lincoln Steffens who stated, upon his return from a pilgrimage to Soviet Russia, “I have seen the future, and it works!” A common expression back then, applied to justify the terrorism, was you’ve got to crack a few eggs to make an omelet.

Hitler observed how the liberals defended and covered up the atrocities of Lenin and Stalin, and he no doubt expected the same treatment when he applied the Marxist concept of collective guilt to the Jews decades later.

To truly understand today’s aggressive Islam, read Chuck Morse’s “The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Hussein”

At least the “enemies of the people” living in either the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany had a slight chance to escape. The Islamic terrorists are at war with the entire world as they just try to kill as many people who have not submitted as possible. They intend to conquer the world as evidenced by the development of nuclear technology in Iran. Iran intends to attack the United States as evidenced by recent meetings held between the Venezuelan dictatorship and Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy. German media outlet Die Welt reports that Iran plans to deliver medium-range Shahab 3 missiles to Venezuela, right in our backyard.

Meanwhile, the despicable precepts of Islamic Shariah law continue to insinuate themselves into Western democracies. It should be noted that Shariah calls for the eventual submission of the planet by means of jihad and subterfuge. Shariah allows for the execution of apostates, homosexuals, women who commit adultery and people who are the unfortunate recipients of a fatwa issued by an Islamic cleric. The backward system that includes polygamy and child marriages completely contradicts both democratic principles and Judeo-Christian precepts of morality and ethics.

Yet in the same way the Communist atrocities were ignored in the past, much of our liberal elites and liberal governments seem to be giving the Islamic terrorists and the creeping phenomena of Islamic cultural hegemony a pass. Examples abound but two will suffice to illustrate this point. A liberal judge has invalidated an attempt by the people of Oklahoma to ban Shariah law as a factor in the crafting of American judicial decisions in their state. The judge argued that the ban would discriminate against Muslims. This illogical decision erodes the separation of church and state, a concept that was once revered by the left. The possibility of Shariah law entering into the American system of jurisprudence, or for that matter any outside legal system, is a troubling development, especially in these times when many judges have forgotten that their function is to uphold the Constitution against all infringements and nothing more. a

The other example I will mention, an example that is emblematic of a growing international phenomenen, is a decision that has just been rendered by a judge in Austria who has banned yodeling, an Austrian tradition, because of a complaint from a Muslim who claimed that yodeling is offensive to his religion. This is an example of a creeping informal cultural dictatorship.

It took a world war to defeat the Nazis and a Cold War to defeat the Soviet Communists. The Islamic terrorists, perhaps learning lessons from the mistakes made by those twin terrorist movements, are now playing a new and potentially more lethal game. It is time to consider the nature of the enemy and to respond accordingly.

Chuck Morse is the author of “The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Hussein” and a talk-show host with Fairness Doctrine Radio.

Posted in: Uncategorized