Dhimmitude… Part of ObamaCare Bill – What Does It Mean? Nothing Good and must be rejected, refused, and outlawed!

Posted on August 7, 2012

“This is not a Western Civilization concept.” Moreover it is un-American, it violates our law and it violates our Constitution. Dhimmitude, specifically Sharia, is totalitarian, it is a theocracy, and it violates the legal standing and liberty of American women, period! It discriminates and against women and non-muslim men too. Fundamental Islam as such is not compatible regardless of our first amendment both because Sharia itself violates it and because it’s not just a religion, it is a foreign political system intertwined, and as stated above it’s dictates are in more ways than one, the anti-thesis to American freedom.

How ironic, it seems we have a war on women here and no less a war on America herself!

Dhimmitude… Part of ObamaCare Bill – What Does It Mean?

New Word For The Day – “Dhimmitude” – What Does It Mean?

Obama used it in the health care bill.  It was specifically spelled out in one of the original drafts of the ObamaCare bill (page 107) but was taken out after negative fallout from those who actually read the bill.

Now isn’t this interesting?

Word of the Day: Dhimmitude

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam.

ObamaCare allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States.  Does anyone find that odd… and frightening?  Folks, this is exclusively an Islamic concept under Sharia Law. So exclusive they had to make up an English word to define the concept. Why would our government start interjecting Sharia Law concepts into new broad and sweeping legislation like health care reform that would control the US population? ….Anyone?

Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be “gambling”, “risk-taking”, and “usury” and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this.

How convenient. So a Christian (Jew, Buddhist, Aethiest, etc) , will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of their assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because they refuse to buy health insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan and all other U.S. Muslims will have no such penalty and will have 100% of their health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-Muslims paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. This is Sharia Law definition of… Dhimmitude. This is not a Western Civilization concept.

Dhimmit has two purposes: To enrich Muslims AND to drive conversions to Islam. “Sure, I’ll be a Muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, bro?” (not for me, I will suffer first).  So… are you asking yourself, why would our president and the people who wrote the healthcare bill put this in there???


We fully recognize that there are reformed muslims who denounce and reject fundamentalist islam, but as for the rest who are great in numbes and are a great threat, this is America, if you want to live in an Islamic country, get the hell out and go to one, and saying that is no different than if we were saying it to a Nazi!

Beware folks, this and many other things are happening in the U.S. and they must be stopped and outlawed outright. For the reasons stated above, as well as below, we must not tolerate this, no political correctness, no “but we are tolerant” (because they are not and nor are they good citizens). Every state in the union must refuse to recognize Sharia not only with respect to their own constitutions, but the U.S. constitution as well, especially when the federal government under the leadership of the current white house isn’t doing so! There should no acceptance of any Islamic justifications for owning their wife, and for multiple wives, and for beating their wife, selling their wife, raping their wife, killing their wife, marrying children, killing their own children, the subservient tax system, class system, dhimmitude, and all such things, or for the mass murder of Americans such as at Ft Hood!!!

No Sharia divorce in UK: Muslim told to pay ex-wife maintenance even though he owes her nothing according to Islamic law

Sharia and Western law are incompatible and the conflicts will inevitably grow, but the Infidels are standing their ground on this one in the UK. For now. At least until they get hit with a cascade of “Islamophobia” charges. Dr. Zaid al-Saffar is already playing the victim. “You can’t use sharia law in divorce deal: Muslim hospital consultant told to pay ex-wife maintenance despite claims he owes her nothing under Islamic rules,” by Steve Doughty for the Daily Mail, July 25 (thanks to David):

A Muslim hospital consultant was told yesterday that he must pay his ex-wife maintenance even though under Islamic rules he believes he owes her nothing.

A judge told Dr Zaid Al-Saffar that he must follow ‘the rule in this country’ and share his money.

The Appeal Court decision means Dr Al-Saffar must pay £60,000 to his former wife, academic Hanan Al-Saffar.

The ruling sounded a warning to Muslim couples who believe their marriages are ordered according to sharia law and agree to be bound by Islamic courts.

Lord Justice Ward told Dr Al-Saffar: ‘The rule in this country is that you share and the starting point is equal division.

‘You came out of the marriage without having made your wife any substantial capital payment.’

He added: ‘Life is sometimes hard; do not be consumed with bitterness.’

But Dr Al-Saffar said after the case: ‘By playing the system and pretending to be a victim she got everything, which I think is totally unfair.

‘Family law in this country is biased against Muslim people.’…

Family law in Sharia states is biased against women.

Posted in: Uncategorized